netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] Multi-queue aware sch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20251128095041.29df1d22@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2025 09:50:41 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...e.dk>
Cc: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, Jamal Hadi Salim
 <jhs@...atatu.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, "David S. Miller"
 <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni
 <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Jonas
 Köppeler <j.koeppeler@...berlin.de>,
 cake@...ts.bufferbloat.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] Multi-queue aware sch_cake

On Thu, 27 Nov 2025 20:27:49 +0100 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> > Is there any chance you could provide selftests for this new qdisc
> > together with this patchset?
> >
> > I guess iproute2 is the main blocker?  
> 
> Yeah; how about I follow up with a selftest after this has been merged
> into both the kernel and iproute2?

Why is iproute2 a blocker? Because you're not sure if the "API" won't
change or because you're worried about NIPA or.. ?