[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251128104057.047704b5@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2025 10:40:57 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@...nel.org>
Cc: Ankit Khushwaha <ankitkhushwaha.linux@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, mptcp@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Mat Martineau
<martineau@...nel.org>, Geliang Tang <geliang@...nel.org>, "David S.
Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo
Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Nathan
Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, Nick Desaulniers
<nick.desaulniers+lkml@...il.com>, Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>, Justin
Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests: mptcp: initialize raw_addr to Null
On Fri, 28 Nov 2025 11:34:38 +0100 Matthieu Baerts wrote:
> > Including kselftest.h will be needed.
>
> Because mptcp_connect.c is a tool that is used by other selftests, but
> it doesn't interact directly with the selftests, maybe we don't need to
> include it, and only add this #define in mptcp_connect.c?
>
> #define __noreturn __attribute__((__noreturn__))
Up to you, I'd be worried that some semi-automated patch generator will
send us a "cleanup" to remove this as duplication. But I'm overly
sensitive to this sort of followups so we can try if you prefer :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists