netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] sfc: correct kernel-doc complaints

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20251201144543.26f845de@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 14:45:43 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>, Andrew
 Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
 Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon
 Horman <horms@...nel.org>, linux-net-drivers@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] sfc: correct kernel-doc complaints

On Sat, 29 Nov 2025 14:03:51 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrote:
> + * @port_id: port id (Ethernet address) if !CONFIG_SFC_SRIOV;
> + *   for CONFIG_SFC_SRIOV, the VF port id

Thanks for the cleanup, but TBH this one sounds a little bit awkward.
Hopefully the SFC / AMD folks can suggest better wording. I'm dropping
this version from PW, I'm trying to wrap up netdev for 6.19..
-- 
pw-bot: cr