[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4aaa73b4-3a2a-44f6-ad81-74c30be13431@mailbox.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 02:30:31 +0100
From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...lbox.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Aleksander Jan Bajkowski <olek2@...pl>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Michael Klein <michael@...sekall.de>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next,PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: net: realtek,rtl82xx: Document
realtek,ssc-enable property
On 12/1/25 8:20 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 30/11/2025 14:41, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 11/30/25 9:20 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>
>> Hello Krzysztof,
>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/realtek,rtl82xx.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/realtek,rtl82xx.yaml
>>>> index eafcc2f3e3d66..f1bd0095026be 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/realtek,rtl82xx.yaml
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/realtek,rtl82xx.yaml
>>>> @@ -50,6 +50,11 @@ properties:
>>>> description:
>>>> Disable CLKOUT clock, CLKOUT clock default is enabled after hardware reset.
>>>>
>>>> + realtek,ssc-enable:
>>>> + type: boolean
>>>> + description:
>>>> + Enable SSC mode, SSC mode default is disabled after hardware reset.
>>>
>>> I don't want more SSC properties. We already had a big discussions about
>>> it - one person pushing vendor property and only shortly after we learnt
>>> that more vendors want it and they are actually working on this.
>> What kind of a property would you propose I use for this ?
>
> I don't know, please look at existing work around SSC from Peng. If
> nothing is applicable, this should be explained somewhere.
The work from Peng you refer to (I guess) is this "assigned-clock-sscs"
property ? This is not applicable, because this is a boolean property of
the PHY here, the clock does not expose those clock via the clock API.
However, I can call the property "ssc-enable" without the realtek,
vendor prefix ?
The remaining question is, should I have one property "ssc-enable" to
control all SSC in the PHY or one for each bit "realtek,ssc-enable-rxc"
/ "realtek,ssc-enable-clkout" ?
--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
Powered by blists - more mailing lists