[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <89b15d8b-f145-40f5-a56a-07b73b3ea899@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 19:30:30 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@...nel.org>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: MPTCP deadlocks
On 12/3/25 6:37 PM, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
> On 03/12/2025 16:35, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> Not sure if its the new machines or some of the recent work in MPTCP
>> but we hit a deadlock in the tests a couple of times:
>
> Thank you for the message, I didn't notice that, and I didn't see this
> issue in our CI. So maybe due to both the new machines and the recent work.
>
> I will check if one of my syzkaller instances didn't find the same bug,
> hopefully with a reproducer.
caused by:
ommit f8a1d9b18c5efc76784f5a326e905f641f839894
Author: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Date: Mon Jul 14 18:41:44 2025 +0200
mptcp: make fallback action and fallback decision atomic
I think it's just quite unlikely to hit the relevant code path with the
suitable status to trigger the bug.
@Matttbe: if it's ok I'll send a patch directly to net
/P
Powered by blists - more mailing lists