netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf v1 1/2] bpf: cpumap: propagate underlying error in cpu_map_update

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAADnVQKJ2wzZSCmYPR_wTfp3pLDpHjTVQ0RLviHWGMtWzVy8-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2025 04:22:02 -0800
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Kohei Enju <enjuk@...zon.com>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, 
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eduard <eddyz87@...il.com>, 
	Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>, 
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, 
	kernel-team <kernel-team@...udflare.com>, kohei.enju@...il.com, 
	KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, 
	Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, 
	Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, 
	Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...nel.org>, 
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v1 1/2] bpf: cpumap: propagate underlying error in cpu_map_update_elem()

On Sat, Dec 6, 2025 at 9:14 PM Kohei Enju <enjuk@...zon.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 6 Dec 2025 04:06:38 -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>
> >On Sat, Dec 6, 2025 at 9:01 PM Kohei Enju <enjuk@...zon.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Ah, I forgot that bpf-next is closed until Jan 2nd due to the merge window.
> >> I'll resend v2 after Jan 2nd :)
> >
> >?! It's not closed. net-next is.
>
> Oh, really?
> Hmm, I've read the documentation[1], but I may misunderstand something. Perhaps that documentation is outdated?
>
> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst#n232

yes. It's seriously outdated. bpf-next was never closed.