lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251210205915.3b055b7c@pumpkin>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2025 20:59:15 +0000
From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@...il.com>
To: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@...labora.com>
Cc: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>, Rasmus Villemoes
 <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
 Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, Jonathan Cameron
 <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>, Crt Mori <cmo@...exis.com>, Richard Genoud
 <richard.genoud@...tlin.com>, Andy Shevchenko
 <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>, Luo Jie <quic_luoj@...cinc.com>, Peter
 Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Simon
 Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>, Mika Westerberg
 <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>, Andreas Noever
 <andreas.noever@...il.com>, Yehezkel Bernat <YehezkelShB@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] bitmap: Use FIELD_PREP() in expansion of
 FIELD_PREP_WM16()

On Wed, 10 Dec 2025 20:18:30 +0100
Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@...labora.com> wrote:

> On Tuesday, 9 December 2025 11:03:07 Central European Standard Time david.laight.linux@...il.com wrote:
> > From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@...il.com>
> > 
> > Instead of directly expanding __BF_FIELD_CHECK() (which really ought
> > not be used outside bitfield) and open-coding the generation of the
> > masked value, just call FIELD_PREP() and add an extra check for
> > the mask being at most 16 bits.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: David Laight <david.laight.linux@...il.com>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/hw_bitfield.h | 17 ++++++++---------
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/hw_bitfield.h b/include/linux/hw_bitfield.h
> > index df202e167ce4..d7f21b60449b 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/hw_bitfield.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/hw_bitfield.h
> > @@ -23,15 +23,14 @@
> >   * register, a bit in the lower half is only updated if the corresponding bit
> >   * in the upper half is high.
> >   */
> > -#define FIELD_PREP_WM16(_mask, _val)					     \
> > -	({								     \
> > -		typeof(_val) __val = _val;				     \
> > -		typeof(_mask) __mask = _mask;				     \
> > -		__BF_FIELD_CHECK(__mask, ((u16)0U), __val,		     \
> > -				 "HWORD_UPDATE: ");			     \
> > -		(((typeof(__mask))(__val) << __bf_shf(__mask)) & (__mask)) | \
> > -		((__mask) << 16);					     \
> > -	})
> > +#define FIELD_PREP_WM16(mask, val)				\
> > +({								\
> > +	__auto_type _mask = mask;				\
> > +	u32 _val = FIELD_PREP(_mask, val);			\
> > +	BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(_mask > 0xffffu,			\
> > +			 "FIELD_PREP_WM16: mask too large");	\
> > +	_val | (_mask << 16);					\
> > +})
> >  
> >  /**
> >   * FIELD_PREP_WM16_CONST() - prepare a constant bitfield element with a mask in
> >   
> 
> This breaks the build for at least one driver that uses
> FIELD_PREP_WM16, namely phy-rockchip-emmc.c:

Not in my allmodconfig build.
... 
> pcie-dw-rockchip.c is similarly broken by this change, except
> without the superfluous wrapper:

That one did get built.

The problem is that FIELD_PREP_WM16() needs to use different 'local'
variables than FIELD_PREP().
The 'proper' fix is to use unique names (as min() and max() do), but that
makes the whole thing unreadable and is best avoided unless nesting is
likely.
In this case s/mask/wm16_mask/ and s/val/wm16_val/ might be best.

	David


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ