[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aTqZUSZaZjDTlejt@horms.kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2025 10:13:37 +0000
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: "Alice C. Munduruca" <alice.munduruca@...onical.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] selftests: net: fix "buffer overflow detected" for
tap.c
On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 05:39:32PM -0500, Alice C. Munduruca wrote:
> When 'tap.c' is compiled with '-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3', the strcpy() in
> rtattr_add_strsz() is replaced with a checked version which causes the
> test to consistently fail when compiled with toolchains for which this
> option is enabled by default.
>
> TAP version 13
> 1..3
> # Starting 3 tests from 1 test cases.
> # RUN tap.test_packet_valid_udp_gso ...
> *** buffer overflow detected ***: terminated
> # test_packet_valid_udp_gso: Test terminated by assertion
> # FAIL tap.test_packet_valid_udp_gso
> not ok 1 tap.test_packet_valid_udp_gso
> # RUN tap.test_packet_valid_udp_csum ...
> *** buffer overflow detected ***: terminated
> # test_packet_valid_udp_csum: Test terminated by assertion
> # FAIL tap.test_packet_valid_udp_csum
> not ok 2 tap.test_packet_valid_udp_csum
> # RUN tap.test_packet_crash_tap_invalid_eth_proto ...
> *** buffer overflow detected ***: terminated
> # test_packet_crash_tap_invalid_eth_proto: Test terminated by assertion
> # FAIL tap.test_packet_crash_tap_invalid_eth_proto
> not ok 3 tap.test_packet_crash_tap_invalid_eth_proto
> # FAILED: 0 / 3 tests passed.
> # Totals: pass:0 fail:3 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
>
> Using `memcpy`, an unchecked function, avoids this issue and allows
> the tests to go forwards as expected.
>
> Fixes: 2e64fe4624d1 ("selftests: add few test cases for tap driver")
> Signed-off-by: Alice C. Munduruca <alice.munduruca@...onical.com>
Thanks Alice,
I agree that this approach makes sense.
But I wonder if the commit message should also mention:
1. That this is consistent with usage elsewhere in this file
2. Why there is actually no overflow.
...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists