netdev - Re: [PATCH net 2/2] selftests: fib_nexthops: Add test case for ipv4 multi nexthops

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e5d23fd2-50f6-4a30-ad27-ac99a8874b37@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2025 15:02:35 -0700
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
To: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>,
 Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
 Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/2] selftests: fib_nexthops: Add test case for ipv4
 multi nexthops

On 12/13/25 2:26 PM, Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
>> There is more going on than just not using the group feature.
>>
>> Would it make sense to split this into two test patches, a base test
>> and a follow-on that extends with the loopback special case?
> 
> Sounds reasonable, I'll split it in v2
> 

any test case for loopback needs another one with VRFs where the VRF
device is the loopback for that domain.