[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aUAcHVULgJTpdGzT@lore-desk>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 15:33:01 +0100
From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: airoha: Move net_devs registration in a
dedicated routine
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2025 at 10:30:07AM +0100, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > Since airoha_probe() is not executed under rtnl lock, there is small race
> > where a given device is configured by user-space while the remaining ones
> > are not completely loaded from the dts yet. This condition will allow a
> > hw device misconfiguration since there are some conditions (e.g. GDM2 check
> > in airoha_dev_init()) that require all device are properly loaded from the
> > device tree. Fix the issue moving net_devices registration at the end of
> > the airoha_probe routine.
> >
> > Fixes: 9cd451d414f6e ("net: airoha: Add loopback support for GDM2")
> > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
>
> Hi Lorenzo,
>
> As a fix this patch looks good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Hi Simon,
thx for the review.
>
> But I am somewhat surprised that the netdev isn't unregistered earlier
> both in airoha_remove() and the unwind ladder of airoha_probe().
do you mean moving unregister_netdev() before
airoha_qdma_stop_napi()/airoha_hw_cleanup()? I was thinking about it to be
honest :)
Since it is not related to this fix, I will post a patch as soon as net-next is
open again.
Regards,
Lorenzo
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists