[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c3e98e4c-abc6-4918-9d63-cf3c6b47d943@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 13:17:15 +0000
From: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, linux-net-drivers@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] sfc: correct kernel-doc complaints
On 14/12/2025 19:16, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Fix kernel-doc warnings by adding 3 missing struct member descriptions
> in struct efx_ef10_nic_data and removing preprocessor directives (which
> are not handled by kernel-doc).
>
> Fixes these 5 warnings:
> Warning: drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/nic.h:158 bad line: #ifdef CONFIG_SFC_SRIOV
> Warning: drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/nic.h:160 bad line: #endif
> Warning: drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/nic.h:204 struct member 'port_id'
> not described in 'efx_ef10_nic_data'
> Warning: drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/nic.h:204 struct member 'vf_index'
> not described in 'efx_ef10_nic_data'
> Warning: drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/nic.h:204 struct member 'licensed_features'
> not described in 'efx_ef10_nic_data'
>
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Reviewed-by: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>
(and sorry for using gmail despite its ongoing war on federation;
unfortunately it's the least bad alternative available to me)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists