lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251221084218-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2025 08:42:51 -0500
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbui99@...il.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>,
	Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>,
	virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	bpf@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] virtio-net: enable all napis before scheduling
 refill work

On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 12:03:29PM +0700, Bui Quang Minh wrote:
> On 12/17/25 09:58, Jason Wang wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 12:23 AM Bui Quang Minh
> > <minhquangbui99@...il.com> wrote:
> > > On 12/16/25 11:16, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Dec 12, 2025 at 11:28 PM Bui Quang Minh
> > > > <minhquangbui99@...il.com> wrote:
> > > > > Calling napi_disable() on an already disabled napi can cause the
> > > > > deadlock. In commit 4bc12818b363 ("virtio-net: disable delayed refill
> > > > > when pausing rx"), to avoid the deadlock, when pausing the RX in
> > > > > virtnet_rx_pause[_all](), we disable and cancel the delayed refill work.
> > > > > However, in the virtnet_rx_resume_all(), we enable the delayed refill
> > > > > work too early before enabling all the receive queue napis.
> > > > > 
> > > > > The deadlock can be reproduced by running
> > > > > selftests/drivers/net/hw/xsk_reconfig.py with multiqueue virtio-net
> > > > > device and inserting a cond_resched() inside the for loop in
> > > > > virtnet_rx_resume_all() to increase the success rate. Because the worker
> > > > > processing the delayed refilled work runs on the same CPU as
> > > > > virtnet_rx_resume_all(), a reschedule is needed to cause the deadlock.
> > > > > In real scenario, the contention on netdev_lock can cause the
> > > > > reschedule.
> > > > > 
> > > > > This fixes the deadlock by ensuring all receive queue's napis are
> > > > > enabled before we enable the delayed refill work in
> > > > > virtnet_rx_resume_all() and virtnet_open().
> > > > > 
> > > > > Fixes: 4bc12818b363 ("virtio-net: disable delayed refill when pausing rx")
> > > > > Reported-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
> > > > > Closes: https://netdev-ctrl.bots.linux.dev/logs/vmksft/drv-hw-dbg/results/400961/3-xdp-py/stderr
> > > > > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbui99@...il.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > Changes in v2:
> > > > > - Move try_fill_recv() before rx napi_enable()
> > > > > - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20251208153419.18196-1-minhquangbui99@gmail.com/
> > > > > ---
> > > > >    drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> > > > >    1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > > > > index 8e04adb57f52..4e08880a9467 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > > > > @@ -3214,21 +3214,31 @@ static void virtnet_update_settings(struct virtnet_info *vi)
> > > > >    static int virtnet_open(struct net_device *dev)
> > > > >    {
> > > > >           struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
> > > > > +       bool schedule_refill = false;
> > > > >           int i, err;
> > > > > 
> > > > > -       enable_delayed_refill(vi);
> > > > > -
> > > > > +       /* - We must call try_fill_recv before enabling napi of the same receive
> > > > > +        * queue so that it doesn't race with the call in virtnet_receive.
> > > > > +        * - We must enable and schedule delayed refill work only when we have
> > > > > +        * enabled all the receive queue's napi. Otherwise, in refill_work, we
> > > > > +        * have a deadlock when calling napi_disable on an already disabled
> > > > > +        * napi.
> > > > > +        */
> > > > >           for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
> > > > >                   if (i < vi->curr_queue_pairs)
> > > > >                           /* Make sure we have some buffers: if oom use wq. */
> > > > >                           if (!try_fill_recv(vi, &vi->rq[i], GFP_KERNEL))
> > > > > -                               schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
> > > > > +                               schedule_refill = true;
> > > > > 
> > > > >                   err = virtnet_enable_queue_pair(vi, i);
> > > > >                   if (err < 0)
> > > > >                           goto err_enable_qp;
> > > > >           }
> > > > So NAPI could be scheduled and it may want to refill but since refill
> > > > is not enabled, there would be no refill work.
> > > > 
> > > > Is this a problem?
> > > You are right. It is indeed a problem.
> > > 
> > > I think we can unconditionally schedule the delayed refill after
> > > enabling all the RX NAPIs (don't check the boolean schedule_refill
> > > anymore) to ensure that we will have refill work. We can still keep the
> > > try_fill_recv here to fill the receive buffer earlier in normal case.
> > > What do you think?
> > Or we can have a reill_pending
> 
> Okay, let me implement this in the next version.
> 
> > but basically I think we need something
> > that is much more simple. That is, using a per rq work instead of a
> > global one?
> 
> I think we can leave this in a net-next patch later.
> 
> Thanks,
> Quang Minh

i am not sure per rq is not simpler than this pile of tricks.


> > 
> > Thanks
> > 
> > > > 
> > > > > +       enable_delayed_refill(vi);
> > > > > +       if (schedule_refill)
> > > > > +               schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
> > > > > +
> > > > >           if (virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_STATUS)) {
> > > > >                   if (vi->status & VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP)
> > > > >                           netif_carrier_on(vi->dev);
> > > > > @@ -3463,39 +3473,48 @@ static void virtnet_rx_pause(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq)
> > > > >           __virtnet_rx_pause(vi, rq);
> > > > >    }
> > > > > 
> > > > Thanks
> > > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Quang Minh.
> > > 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ