[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251221084615.GD13030@unreal>
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2025 10:46:15 +0200
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: 熊伟民 <15927021679@....com>
Cc: "Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>,
Thomas Monjalon <thomas@...jalon.net>,
David Marchand <david.marchand@...hat.com>,
Luca Boccassi <bluca@...ian.org>,
Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@...hat.com>,
Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@...onical.com>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@...hat.com>,
Xueming Li <xuemingl@...dia.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@...hat.com>,
Chenbo Xia <chenbox@...dia.com>,
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@...el.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
RDMA mailing list <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Re: Implement initial driver for virtio-RDMA device(kernel)
On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 10:19:15AM +0800, 熊伟民 wrote:
>
> At 2025-12-19 00:30:08, "Leon Romanovsky" <leon@...nel.org> wrote:
> >On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 05:09:40PM +0800, Xiong Weimin wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> This testing instructions aims to introduce an emulating a soft ROCE
> >> device with normal NIC(no RDMA), we have finished a vhost-user RDMA
> >> device demo, which can work with RDMA features such as CM, QP type of
> >> UC/UD and so on.
> >
> >Same question as on your QEMU patches.
> >https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251218162028.GG400630@unreal/
> >
> >And as a bare minimum, you should run get_maintainers.pl script on your
> >patches and add the right people and ML to the CC/TO fields.
> >
>
> >Thanks
>
>
> Since this feature involves coordinated changes across QEMU, DPDK, and the kernel,
> I have submitted patches for all three components to every maintainer. This is to
> ensure that senior developers can review the complete architecture and code.
Please run get_maintainers.pl on your kernel patches and check if you
really added "every maintainer".
Hint, you didn't even add right mailing list here.
Thanks
>
>
> Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists