[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bbd3cd9d-3a81-4f7d-9220-02d9df03d78a@microchip.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2025 09:48:27 +0100
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Linux PM
<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>, Claudiu Beznea
<claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S.
Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub
Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 11/23] net: cadence: macb: Discard pm_runtime_put()
return value
On 22/12/2025 at 21:14, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> Passing pm_runtime_put() return value to the callers is not particularly
> useful.
>
> Returning an error code from pm_runtime_put() merely means that it has
> not queued up a work item to check whether or not the device can be
> suspended and there are many perfectly valid situations in which that
> can happen, like after writing "on" to the devices' runtime PM "control"
> attribute in sysfs for one example. It also happens when the kernel is
> configured with CONFIG_PM unset.
>
> Accordingly, update at91ether_close() to simply discard the return
> value of pm_runtime_put() and always return success to the caller.
>
> This will facilitate a planned change of the pm_runtime_put() return
> type to void in the future.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> ---
>
> This patch is part of a series, but it doesn't depend on anything else
> in that series. The last patch in the series depends on it.
>
> It can be applied by itself and if you decide to do so, please let me
> know.
>
> Otherwise, an ACK or equivalent will be appreciated, but also the lack
> of specific criticism will be eventually regarded as consent.
Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
Ok to take whichever route you choose, with a preference in staying with
the other patches of the batch.
Thanks, regards,
Nicolas
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c
> @@ -4837,7 +4837,9 @@ static int at91ether_close(struct net_de
>
> at91ether_stop(lp);
>
> - return pm_runtime_put(&lp->pdev->dev);
> + pm_runtime_put(&lp->pdev->dev);
> +
> + return 0;
> }
>
> /* Transmit packet */
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists