[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d210552f-c8bf-4084-9317-b743075d9946@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2025 09:47:34 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Robert Marko <robert.marko@...tura.hr>
Cc: robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
claudiu.beznea@...on.dev, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, davem@...emloft.net,
vkoul@...nel.org, andi.shyti@...nel.org, lee@...nel.org,
andrew+netdev@...n.ch, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, linusw@...nel.org, Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com,
daniel.machon@...rochip.com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
olivia@...enic.com, radu_nicolae.pirea@....ro, richard.genoud@...tlin.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jirislaby@...nel.org, broonie@...nel.org,
mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, lars.povlsen@...rochip.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, luka.perkov@...tura.hr
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/15] include: dt-bindings: add LAN969x clock bindings
On 24/12/2025 15:01, Robert Marko wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 24, 2025 at 2:05 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 24/12/2025 11:30, Robert Marko wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 24, 2025 at 11:21 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Dec 23, 2025 at 09:16:12PM +0100, Robert Marko wrote:
>>>>> Add the required LAN969x clock bindings.
>>>>
>>>> I do not see clock bindings actually here. Where is the actual binding?
>>>> Commit msg does not help me at all to understand why you are doing this
>>>> without actual required bindings.
>>>
>>> I guess it is a bit confusing, there is no schema here, these are the
>>> clock indexes that
>>> reside in dt-bindings and are used by the SoC DTSI.
>>
>> I understand as not used by drivers? Then no ABI and there is no point
>> in putting them into bindings.
>
> It is not included by the driver directly, but it requires these exact
> indexes to be passed
> so its effectively ABI.
How it requires the exact index? In what way? I do not see anything in
the gck driver using/relying on these values. Nothing. Please point me
to the line which directly uses these values.... or how many times I
will need to write this is not ABI?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists