netdev - Re: [PATCH v1 10/23] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: Discard pm_runtime

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20260102155337.2bab8b90@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2026 15:53:37 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, LKML
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, Brian
 Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
 <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Siddharth Vadapalli
 <s-vadapalli@...com>, Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 10/23] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: Discard
 pm_runtime_put() return value

On Mon, 22 Dec 2025 21:11:42 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This patch is part of a series, but it doesn't depend on anything else
> in that series.  The last patch in the series depends on it.

Would you mind reposting patches 10, 11, 12 of the series as a single
set? If we get CCed only on a subset of the series PW assumes the rest
got eaten by email goblins and our CI doesn't process any of them.