netdev - [PATCH bpf 2/2] selftests/bpf: Update xdp_context_test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20260105114747.1358750-2-toke@redhat.com>
Date: Mon,  5 Jan 2026 12:47:46 +0100
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>
Cc: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
	Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
	Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf 2/2] selftests/bpf: Update xdp_context_test_run test to check maximum metadata size

Update the selftest to check that the metadata size check takes the
xdp_frame size into account in bpf_prog_test_run. The original
check (for meta size 256) was broken because the data frame supplied was
smaller than this, triggering a different EINVAL return. So supply a
larger data frame for this test to make sure we actually exercise the
check we think we are.

Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
---
 .../bpf/prog_tests/xdp_context_test_run.c          | 14 +++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_context_test_run.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_context_test_run.c
index ee94c281888a..24d7d6d8fea1 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_context_test_run.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_context_test_run.c
@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ void test_xdp_context_test_run(void)
 	struct test_xdp_context_test_run *skel = NULL;
 	char data[sizeof(pkt_v4) + sizeof(__u32)];
 	char bad_ctx[sizeof(struct xdp_md) + 1];
+	char large_data[256];
 	struct xdp_md ctx_in, ctx_out;
 	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, opts,
 			    .data_in = &data,
@@ -94,9 +95,6 @@ void test_xdp_context_test_run(void)
 	test_xdp_context_error(prog_fd, opts, 4, sizeof(__u32), sizeof(data),
 			       0, 0, 0);
 
-	/* Meta data must be 255 bytes or smaller */
-	test_xdp_context_error(prog_fd, opts, 0, 256, sizeof(data), 0, 0, 0);
-
 	/* Total size of data must be data_end - data_meta or larger */
 	test_xdp_context_error(prog_fd, opts, 0, sizeof(__u32),
 			       sizeof(data) + 1, 0, 0, 0);
@@ -116,6 +114,16 @@ void test_xdp_context_test_run(void)
 	test_xdp_context_error(prog_fd, opts, 0, sizeof(__u32), sizeof(data),
 			       0, 0, 1);
 
+	/* Meta data must be 216 bytes or smaller (256 - sizeof(struct
+	 * xdp_frame)). Test both nearest invalid size and nearest invalid
+	 * 4-byte-aligned size, and make sure data_in is large enough that we
+	 * actually hit the cheeck on metadata length
+	 */
+	opts.data_in = large_data;
+	opts.data_size_in = sizeof(large_data);
+	test_xdp_context_error(prog_fd, opts, 0, 217, sizeof(large_data), 0, 0, 0);
+	test_xdp_context_error(prog_fd, opts, 0, 220, sizeof(large_data), 0, 0, 0);
+
 	test_xdp_context_test_run__destroy(skel);
 }
 
-- 
2.52.0