[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260105160458.5483a5ea@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2026 16:04:58 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
Cc: Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>, Pavan Chebbi
<pavan.chebbi@...adcom.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S.
Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo
Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
"Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>, Vadim Fedorenko
<vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>, Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...a.com,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] bnxt_en: Fix NULL pointer crash in
bnxt_ptp_enable during error cleanup
On Mon, 05 Jan 2026 04:00:16 -0800 Breno Leitao wrote:
> init_err_pci_clean:
> bnxt_hwrm_func_drv_unrgtr(bp);
> + bnxt_ptp_clear(bp);
> + kfree(bp->ptp_cfg);
> bnxt_free_hwrm_resources(bp);
> bnxt_hwmon_uninit(bp);
> bnxt_ethtool_free(bp);
> - bnxt_ptp_clear(bp);
> - kfree(bp->ptp_cfg);
> bp->ptp_cfg = NULL;
Is there a reason to leave clearing of the pointer behind?
I don't see it mentioned in the commit msg..
Checking previous discussion it sounds like Pavan asked for the
clearing to also be moved.
> kfree(bp->fw_health);
> bp->fw_health = NULL;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists