[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260105174140.1c2b9021@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2026 17:41:40 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Fan Gong <gongfan1@...wei.com>
Cc: Zhu Yikai <zhuyikai1@...artners.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "David
S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo
Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn
<andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>, Pavan
Chebbi <pavan.chebbi@...adcom.com>, ALOK TIWARI <alok.a.tiwari@...cle.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, luosifu
<luosifu@...wei.com>, Xin Guo <guoxin09@...wei.com>, Shen Chenyang
<shenchenyang1@...ilicon.com>, Zhou Shuai <zhoushuai28@...wei.com>, Wu Like
<wulike1@...wei.com>, Shi Jing <shijing34@...wei.com>, Luo Yang
<luoyang82@...artners.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v08 8/9] hinic3: Add mac filter ops
AI code review points out:
> +static int hinic3_mac_filter_sync_hw(struct net_device *netdev,
> + struct list_head *del_list,
> + struct list_head *add_list,
> + int *add_count)
> +{
> + struct hinic3_mac_filter *ftmp;
> + struct hinic3_mac_filter *f;
> + int err;
> +
> + if (!list_empty(del_list)) {
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(f, ftmp, del_list, list) {
> + /* ignore errors when deleting mac */
> + hinic3_filter_addr_unsync(netdev, f->addr);
> + list_del(&f->list);
> + kfree(f);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (!list_empty(add_list)) {
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(f, ftmp, add_list, list) {
> + if (f->state != HINIC3_MAC_HW_SYNCING)
> + continue;
> +
> + err = hinic3_filter_addr_sync(netdev, f->addr);
> + if (err) {
> + netdev_err(netdev, "Failed to add mac\n");
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + f->state = HINIC3_MAC_HW_SYNCED;
> + (*add_count)++;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
[ ... ]
> + err = hinic3_mac_filter_sync_hw(netdev, &tmp_del_list,
> + &tmp_add_list, &add_count);
> + if (err) {
> + /* there were errors, delete all mac in hw */
> + hinic3_undo_add_filter_entries(mac_filter_list, &tmp_add_list);
[ ... ]
> + hinic3_mac_filter_sync_hw(netdev, &tmp_del_list,
> + &tmp_add_list, NULL);
^^^^
Can this NULL pointer dereference add_count in hinic3_mac_filter_sync_hw()?
When hinic3_filter_addr_sync() fails in the first call to
hinic3_mac_filter_sync_hw(), the function returns early with an error.
At that point tmp_add_list may still contain entries with state
HINIC3_MAC_HW_SYNCING (entries that were not yet processed).
The second call passes NULL for add_count. If tmp_add_list is not empty
and has entries with HINIC3_MAC_HW_SYNCING state, the code will execute
(*add_count)++ with add_count being NULL.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists