lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a72faee7-b77f-4654-aab3-8fe24472aaac@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2026 20:18:42 +0100
From: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller"
 <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>,
 Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com>,
 Grzegorz Nitka <grzegorz.nitka@...el.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
 Petr Oros <poros@...hat.com>, Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@...hat.com>,
 Prathosh Satish <Prathosh.Satish@...rochip.com>,
 Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
 Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
 Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
 Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>, Mark Bloch <mbloch@...dia.com>,
 Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
 Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
 Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>,
 Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>, Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@....net>,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
 Horatiu Vultur <Horatiu.Vultur@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 01/13] dt-bindings: net: ethernet-controller:
 Add DPLL pin properties

On 1/7/26 6:31 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>> I have no idea what makes sense for ACPI and little interest in
>>> reviewing ACPI bindings. While I think the whole idea of shared
>>> bindings is questionable, really it's a question of review bandwidth
>>> and so far no one has stepped up to review ACPI bindings.
>>
>> It depends... shared bindings allow drivers to read property values
>> without need to have separate OF and ACPI codepaths.
> 
> Do you have real hardware in your hands using ACPI?
> 
Yes, it is based on Intel GNR-D platform with 8 NIC ports and Microchip
DPLL chip on the board.

I.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ