netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] selftests/net: packetdrill: add minimal client and server tests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: 
 <176775001152.2194089.13144888728220975671.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2026 01:40:11 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
 edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, horms@...nel.org,
 ncardwell@...gle.com, kuniyu@...gle.com, willemb@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] selftests/net: packetdrill: add minimal client
 and
 server tests

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>:

On Mon,  5 Jan 2026 12:25:02 -0500 you wrote:
> From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
> 
> Introduce minimal tests. These can serve as simple illustrative
> examples, and as templates when writing new tests.
> 
> When adding new cases, it can be easier to extend an existing base
> test rather than start from scratch. The existing tests all focus on
> real, often non-trivial, features. It is not obvious which to take as
> starting point, and arguably none really qualify.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net-next] selftests/net: packetdrill: add minimal client and server tests
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/3b7a108c4197

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html