netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 for 6.19 0/4] Revise the EM YNL spec to be clearer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <m27btswij3.fsf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2026 09:38:56 +0000
From: Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>
To: Changwoo Min <changwoo@...lia.com>
Cc: lukasz.luba@....com,  rafael@...nel.org,  kuba@...nel.org,
  davem@...emloft.net,  edumazet@...gle.com,  pabeni@...hat.com,
  horms@...nel.org,  lenb@...nel.org,  pavel@...nel.org,
  kernel-dev@...lia.com,  linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
  netdev@...r.kernel.org,  sched-ext@...ts.linux.dev,
  linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 for 6.19 0/4] Revise the EM YNL spec to be clearer

Changwoo Min <changwoo@...lia.com> writes:

> This patch set addresses all the concerns raised at [1] to make the EM YNL spec
> clearer. It includes the following changes:
>
> - Fix the lint errors (1/4). 
> - Rename em.yaml to dev-energymodel.yaml (2/4).  “dev-energymodel” was used
>   instead of “device-energy-model”, which was originally proposed [2], because
>   the netlink protocol name cannot exceed GENL_NAMSIZ(16). In addition, docs
>   strings and flags attributes were added.
> - Change cpus' type from string to u64 array of CPU ids (3/4).
> - Add dump to get-perf-domains in the EM YNL spec (4/4). A user can fetch
>   either information about a specific performance domain with do or information
>   about all performance domains with dump. 
>
> ChangeLog v1 -> v2:
> - Remove perf-domains in the YNL spec, as do and dump of get-perf-domains
>   share the reply format using perf-domain-attrs (4/4).
> - Add example outputs of get-perf-domains and get-perf-table for ease of
>   understanding (cover letter).

v2 looks good, thanks!

Reviewed-by: Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>