[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iKRAs86PVNAGKMUgE49phgZ2zpZU99rRkJq=cc_kNYf=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2026 13:18:54 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: "Chia-Yu Chang (Nokia)" <chia-yu.chang@...ia-bell-labs.com>,
"parav@...dia.com" <parav@...dia.com>, "linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>, "horms@...nel.org" <horms@...nel.org>,
"dsahern@...nel.org" <dsahern@...nel.org>, "kuniyu@...gle.com" <kuniyu@...gle.com>,
"bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"dave.taht@...il.com" <dave.taht@...il.com>, "jhs@...atatu.com" <jhs@...atatu.com>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>, "stephen@...workplumber.org" <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
"xiyou.wangcong@...il.com" <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, "jiri@...nulli.us" <jiri@...nulli.us>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>, "andrew+netdev@...n.ch" <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"donald.hunter@...il.com" <donald.hunter@...il.com>, "ast@...erby.net" <ast@...erby.net>,
"liuhangbin@...il.com" <liuhangbin@...il.com>, "shuah@...nel.org" <shuah@...nel.org>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, "ij@...nel.org" <ij@...nel.org>,
"ncardwell@...gle.com" <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
"Koen De Schepper (Nokia)" <koen.de_schepper@...ia-bell-labs.com>,
"g.white@...lelabs.com" <g.white@...lelabs.com>,
"ingemar.s.johansson@...csson.com" <ingemar.s.johansson@...csson.com>,
"mirja.kuehlewind@...csson.com" <mirja.kuehlewind@...csson.com>, cheshire <cheshire@...le.com>,
"rs.ietf@....at" <rs.ietf@....at>,
"Jason_Livingood@...cast.com" <Jason_Livingood@...cast.com>, Vidhi Goel <vidhi_goel@...le.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 net-next 00/13] AccECN protocol case handling series
On Thu, Jan 8, 2026 at 1:05 PM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On 1/8/26 9:47 AM, Chia-Yu Chang (Nokia) wrote:
> > Regarding the packetdrill cases for AccECN, shall I can include in this patch series (v8) or is it suggested to submit them in a standalone series?
>
> IMHO can be in a separate series, mainly because this one is already
> quite big.
>
> /P
>
If possible, please send a packetdrill series _before_ adding more code.
I have been reluctant to review your changes, because there is no test.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists