netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 2/6] net: phy: add support to set default rules

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b2cc74c0-d63f-418b-9c28-f7a143f61bd3@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2026 15:31:59 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Jijie Shao <shaojijie@...wei.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, horms@...nel.org,
	Frank.Sae@...or-comm.com, hkallweit1@...il.com,
	linux@...linux.org.uk, shenjian15@...wei.com,
	liuyonglong@...wei.com, chenhao418@...wei.com,
	jonathan.cameron@...wei.com, salil.mehta@...wei.com,
	shiyongbang@...wei.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 2/6] net: phy: add support to set default
 rules

> However, there is no way to handle the issue with another patch;
> I cannot directly modify the ACPI table (a risky operation).

It should not be risky. ACPI tables have as many bugs as any other
software. You have to assume they are buggy and will get updated
during their lifetime, so you have processes in place to allow them to
be safely upgraded.

   Andrew