netdev - Re: [PATCH v2] can: ctucanfd: fix SSP_SRC in cases when bit-rate is higher than 1 MBit.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <25616e3d-9fd9-491e-9a93-fa48d3e7ba2c@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2026 11:50:42 +0100
From: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol@...nel.org>
To: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@....cvut.cz>, Ondrej Ille <ondrej.ille@...il.com>,
 linux-can@...r.kernel.org, David Laight <david.laight.linux@...il.com>,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
 Andrea Daoud <andreadaoud6@...il.com>,
 Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Novak <jnovak@....cvut.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] can: ctucanfd: fix SSP_SRC in cases when bit-rate is
 higher than 1 MBit.

On 09/01/2026 at 10:29, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 06.01.2026 23:14:47, Vincent Mailhol wrote:
>>> thanks for pointing to Transmission Delay Compensation
>>> related code introduced in 5.16 kernel. I have noticed it
>>> in the past but not considered it yet and I think
>>> that we need minimal fixes to help users and
>>> allow change to propagate into stable series now.
> 
> How to proceed. Take this fix now an (hopefully) port to the mainline
> TDC framework later?

While I would definitely prefer to see the TDC framework implementation
rather than this quick fix, I will also not block it.

If you feel confident to continue with that patch, go ahead.

Yours sincerely,
Vincent Mailhol