[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aWEaWvV_0SfylwW5@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2026 15:10:18 +0000
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: phy: fixed_phy: replace list of fixed PHYs
with static array
On Thu, Jan 08, 2026 at 06:11:02PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 17:56:26 +0100 Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> > +/* The DSA loop driver may allocate 4 fixed PHY's, and 4 additional
> > + * fixed PHY's for a system should be sufficient.
> > + */
> > +#define NUM_FP 8
> > +
> > struct fixed_phy {
> > - int addr;
> > struct phy_device *phydev;
> > struct fixed_phy_status status;
> > int (*link_update)(struct net_device *, struct fixed_phy_status *);
> > - struct list_head node;
> > };
> >
> > +static struct fixed_phy fmb_fixed_phys[NUM_FP];
> > static struct mii_bus *fmb_mii_bus;
> > -static LIST_HEAD(fmb_phys);
> > +static DEFINE_IDA(phy_fixed_ida);
>
> Isn't IDA an overkill for a range this tiny?
> IDA is useful if the ID range is large and may be sparse.
> Here a bitmap would suffice.
>
> DECLARE_BITMAP(phy_fixed_ids, NUM_FP);
>
> id = find_first_zero_bit(phy_fixed_ids, NUM_FP);
> if (id >= NUM_FP)
> return -ENOSPC;
>
> set_bit(id, phy_fixed_ids);
Racy without locking.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists