[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMB2axPv+wHfj7N7Txcqyar8p9kByZgiChkoW64E+XFJxN2f3A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2026 10:49:59 -0800
From: Amery Hung <ameryhung@...il.com>
To: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, andrii@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net, memxor@...il.com, martin.lau@...nel.org,
kpsingh@...nel.org, yonghong.song@...ux.dev, song@...nel.org,
haoluo@...gle.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 03/16] bpf: Open code bpf_selem_unlink_storage
in bpf_selem_unlink
On Fri, Jan 9, 2026 at 9:42 AM Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev> wrote:
>
> On 12/18/25 9:56 AM, Amery Hung wrote:
> > @@ -396,17 +369,39 @@ static void bpf_selem_link_map_nolock(struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap,
> >
> > void bpf_selem_unlink(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem, bool reuse_now)
>
> bpf_selem_unlink() will not be used by bpf_local_storage_map_free() in
> the later patch, so the "bool reuse_now" arg is no longer needed and
> should be cleaned up.
>
Ack
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists