[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260111014500-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2026 01:46:43 -0500
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@...il.com>
Cc: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@...hat.com>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>, Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
Bryan Tan <bryan-bt.tan@...adcom.com>,
Vishnu Dasa <vishnu.dasa@...adcom.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
berrange@...hat.com, Sargun Dhillon <sargun@...gun.me>,
Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@...a.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next v13 03/13] virtio: set skb owner of
virtio_transport_reset_no_sock() reply
On Tue, Dec 23, 2025 at 04:28:37PM -0800, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> From: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@...a.com>
>
> Associate reply packets with the sending socket. When vsock must reply
> with an RST packet and there exists a sending socket (e.g., for
> loopback), setting the skb owner to the socket correctly handles
> reference counting between the skb and sk (i.e., the sk stays alive
> until the skb is freed).
>
> This allows the net namespace to be used for socket lookups for the
> duration of the reply skb's lifetime, preventing race conditions between
> the namespace lifecycle and vsock socket search using the namespace
> pointer.
>
> Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@...a.com>
> ---
> Changes in v11:
> - move before adding to netns support (Stefano)
can you explain about the revert please?
I looked at feedback from Stefano and all he said
aparently was not to break bisect.
> Changes in v10:
> - break this out into its own patch for easy revert (Stefano)
> ---
> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> index fdb8f5b3fa60..718be9f33274 100644
> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> @@ -1165,6 +1165,12 @@ static int virtio_transport_reset_no_sock(const struct virtio_transport *t,
> .op = VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RST,
> .type = le16_to_cpu(hdr->type),
> .reply = true,
> +
> + /* Set sk owner to socket we are replying to (may be NULL for
> + * non-loopback). This keeps a reference to the sock and
> + * sock_net(sk) until the reply skb is freed.
> + */
> + .vsk = vsock_sk(skb->sk),
> };
> struct sk_buff *reply;
>
>
> --
> 2.47.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists