[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2026011246-monoxide-conjuror-9eac@gregkh>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 12:10:55 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Keerthana K <keerthana.kalyanasundaram@...adcom.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, dsahern@...nel.org,
borisp@...dia.com, john.fastabend@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
ajay.kaher@...adcom.com, alexey.makhalov@...adcom.com,
vamsi-krishna.brahmajosyula@...adcom.com, yin.ding@...adcom.com,
tapas.kundu@...adcom.com, Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>,
Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6.6.y 2/2] tls: Use __sk_dst_get() and dst_dev_rcu() in
get_netdev_for_sock().
On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 12:05:50PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 06:45:54AM +0000, Keerthana K wrote:
> > From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>
> >
> > [ Upstream commit c65f27b9c3be2269918e1cbad6d8884741f835c5 ]
> >
> > get_netdev_for_sock() is called during setsockopt(),
> > so not under RCU.
> >
> > Using sk_dst_get(sk)->dev could trigger UAF.
> >
> > Let's use __sk_dst_get() and dst_dev_rcu().
> >
> > Note that the only ->ndo_sk_get_lower_dev() user is
> > bond_sk_get_lower_dev(), which uses RCU.
> >
> > Fixes: e8f69799810c ("net/tls: Add generic NIC offload infrastructure")
> > Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
> > Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250916214758.650211-6-kuniyu@google.com
> > Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
> > [ Keerthana: Backport to v6.6.y ]
> > Signed-off-by: Keerthana K <keerthana.kalyanasundaram@...adcom.com>
> > ---
> > net/tls/tls_device.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> This is not in 6.12.y, so we can't take it for 6.6.y yet. Can you
> please send a 6.12.y version and then a new 6.6.y version?
OH nevermind, you sent this already, my fault, sorry.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists