[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e500a519-8277-4ddc-be7c-529b64b24860@linux.dev>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 11:41:35 +0000
From: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>
To: Fushuai Wang <fushuai.wang@...ux.dev>, wangfushuai@...du.com
Cc: Jason@...c4.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, wireguard@...ts.zx2c4.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] wireguard: allowedips: Use kfree_rcu() instead of
call_rcu()
On 12/01/2026 03:10, Fushuai Wang wrote:
>> Replace call_rcu() + kmem_cache_free() with kfree_rcu() to simplify
>> the code and reduce function size.
>
> Gentle ping.
I believe you have to resend the patch as it's not going to be
automatically re-evaluated. And you have to rebase it on top of current
net-next. While preparing new patch, please add clear indentification of
the target tree, the subject should look like "[PATCH net-next v3] ..."
in your case.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists