[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a9dcc27d-521e-44b0-b399-c353ef50077a@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 09:40:20 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Mariusz Klimek <maklimek97@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] net: gso: do not include jumbogram HBH
header in seglen calculation
On 1/6/26 10:52 AM, Mariusz Klimek wrote:
> @@ -177,8 +178,13 @@ static unsigned int skb_gso_transport_seglen(const struct sk_buff *skb)
> */
> static unsigned int skb_gso_network_seglen(const struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> - unsigned int hdr_len = skb_transport_header(skb) -
> - skb_network_header(skb);
> + unsigned int off = skb_network_offset(skb) + sizeof(struct ipv6hdr);
> + unsigned int hdr_len = skb_network_header_len(skb);
> +
> + /* Jumbogram HBH header is removed upon segmentation. */
> + if (skb_protocol(skb, true) == htons(ETH_P_IPV6) &&
> + skb->len - off > IPV6_MAXPLEN)
> + hdr_len -= sizeof(struct hop_jumbo_hdr);
IIRC there is some ongoing discussion about introducing big tcp support
for virtio. Perhaps a DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE(SKB_GSO_DODGY) could help
keeping this check updated at due time?
@Jason: could you please double check if I'm off WRT virtio support for
big TCP?
/P
Powered by blists - more mailing lists