[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260113-kerngesund-etage-86de4a21da24@brauner>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 10:34:00 +0100
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To: Günther Noack <gnoack3000@...il.com>
Cc: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>,
Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, Justin Suess <utilityemal77@...il.com>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, Tingmao Wang <m@...wtm.org>,
Samasth Norway Ananda <samasth.norway.ananda@...cle.com>, Matthieu Buffet <matthieu@...fet.re>,
Mikhail Ivanov <ivanov.mikhail1@...wei-partners.com>, konstantin.meskhidze@...wei.com,
Demi Marie Obenour <demiobenour@...il.com>, Alyssa Ross <hi@...ssa.is>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Tahera Fahimi <fahimitahera@...il.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] lsm: Add hook unix_path_connect
On Sat, Jan 10, 2026 at 03:32:57PM +0100, Günther Noack wrote:
> From: Justin Suess <utilityemal77@...il.com>
>
> Adds an LSM hook unix_path_connect.
>
> This hook is called to check the path of a named unix socket before a
> connection is initiated.
>
> Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack3000@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Justin Suess <utilityemal77@...il.com>
> ---
> include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h | 4 ++++
> include/linux/security.h | 11 +++++++++++
> net/unix/af_unix.c | 9 +++++++++
> security/security.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 44 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h b/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h
> index 8c42b4bde09c..1dee5d8d52d2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h
> @@ -317,6 +317,10 @@ LSM_HOOK(int, 0, post_notification, const struct cred *w_cred,
> LSM_HOOK(int, 0, watch_key, struct key *key)
> #endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY && CONFIG_KEY_NOTIFICATIONS */
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK) && defined(CONFIG_SECURITY_PATH)
> +LSM_HOOK(int, 0, unix_path_connect, const struct path *path, int type, int flags)
> +#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK && CONFIG_SECURITY_PATH */
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK
> LSM_HOOK(int, 0, unix_stream_connect, struct sock *sock, struct sock *other,
> struct sock *newsk)
> diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
> index 83a646d72f6f..382612af27a6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/security.h
> +++ b/include/linux/security.h
> @@ -1931,6 +1931,17 @@ static inline int security_mptcp_add_subflow(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk)
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK */
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK) && defined(CONFIG_SECURITY_PATH)
> +
> +int security_unix_path_connect(const struct path *path, int type, int flags);
> +
> +#else /* CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK && CONFIG_SECURITY_PATH */
> +static inline int security_unix_path_connect(const struct path *path, int type, int flags)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK && CONFIG_SECURITY_PATH */
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_INFINIBAND
> int security_ib_pkey_access(void *sec, u64 subnet_prefix, u16 pkey);
> int security_ib_endport_manage_subnet(void *sec, const char *name, u8 port_num);
> diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
> index 55cdebfa0da0..3aabe2d489ae 100644
> --- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
> +++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
> @@ -1226,6 +1226,15 @@ static struct sock *unix_find_bsd(struct sockaddr_un *sunaddr, int addr_len,
> if (!S_ISSOCK(inode->i_mode))
> goto path_put;
>
> + /*
> + * We call the hook because we know that the inode is a socket
> + * and we hold a valid reference to it via the path.
> + */
> + err = security_unix_path_connect(&path, type, flags);
> + if (err)
> + goto path_put;
Couldn't we try reflowing the code here so the path is passed to
security_unix_stream_connect() and security_unix_may_send() so that all
LSMs get the same data and we don't have to have different LSMs hooks
into different callpaths that effectively do the same thing.
I mean the objects are even in two completely different states between
those hooks. Even what type of sockets get a call to the LSM is
different between those two hooks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists