netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v1 0/3] r8169: add dash/LTR/RTL9151AS support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <54148fa4-cb73-41c7-bd5b-fe6e44d80567@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 18:15:53 +0100
From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, javen <javen_xu@...lsil.com.cn>,
 nic_swsd@...ltek.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net,
 edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, horms@...nel.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 0/3] r8169: add dash/LTR/RTL9151AS support

On 1/13/2026 11:01 AM, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On 1/12/26 3:45 AM, javen wrote:
>> From: Javen Xu <javen_xu@...lsil.com.cn>
>>
>> This series patch adds dash support for RTL8127AP, LTR support for
>> RTL8168FP/RTL8168EP/RTL8168H/RTL8125/RTL8126/RTL8127 and support for
>> new chip RTL9151AS.
>>
>> Javen Xu (3):
>>   r8169: add DASH support for RTL8127AP
>>   r8169: enable LTR support
>>   r8169: add support for chip RTL9151AS
>>
>>  drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.h      |   3 +-
>>  drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c | 130 +++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  2 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> Note that you should not have posted this revision with the previous one
> still pending:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260109070415.1115-3-javen_xu@realsil.com.cn/
> 
> I process the patch in order and I applied the above before reaching here.
> 
> @Heiner: I'm sorry for the confusion; the patchwork backlog size called
> for somewhat urgent action and I thought your doubt for the patches
> posted there where solved. Please LMK if a revert is required.
> 
Patches are fine with me.

> @Javen: please wait for Heiner feedback about an eventual revert before
> any further action.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Paolo
> 
Heiner