netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] selftests: net: improve error handling in passive TFO test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1696424e-2092-4e47-bd4f-293e2992056b@web.de>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 09:33:12 +0100
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Yohei Kojima <yk@...oj.net>, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller"
 <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] selftests: net: improve error handling in
 passive TFO test

> Improve the error handling in passive TFO test to check the return value
> from sendto(), and to fail if read() or fprintf() failed.

You propose to adjust error detection and corresponding exception handling another bit.
How do you think about to take also another look if further function implementations
would be similarly affected?

Regards,
Markus