lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aWe5GhgmyDkaBLwS@horms.kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 15:41:14 +0000
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Fushuai Wang <fushuai.wang@...ux.dev>
Cc: Jason@...c4.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net,
	edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
	wireguard@...ts.zx2c4.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, wangfushuai@...du.com,
	vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3] wireguard: allowedips: Use kfree_rcu()
 instead of call_rcu()

On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 09:06:33PM +0800, Fushuai Wang wrote:
> From: Fushuai Wang <wangfushuai@...du.com>
> 
> Replace call_rcu() + kmem_cache_free() with kfree_rcu() to simplify
> the code and reduce function size.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fushuai Wang <wangfushuai@...du.com>

Thanks,

I believe this address prior review and moreover I agree
with the approach taken here.

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>

...

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ