[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871pjr6t08.fsf@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 11:13:30 +0100
From: Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, "Eric
Dumazet" <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, "Simon
Horman" <horms@...nel.org>, Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>, "Andrew
Lunn" <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, "Willem de
Bruijn" <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>, <sdf@...ichev.me>,
<petrm@...dia.com>, <razor@...ckwall.org>, <idosch@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 10/10] selftests: net: tests for add double
tunneling GRO/GSO
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> writes:
> Create a simple, netns-based topology with double, nested UDP tunnels and
> perform TSO transfers on top.
>
> Explicitly enable GSO and/or GRO and check the skb layout consistency with
> different configuration allowing (or not) GSO frames to be delivered on
> the other end.
>
> The trickest part is account in a robust way the aggregated/unaggregated
> packets with double encapsulation: use a classic bpf filter for it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Looks OK overall, just:
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/double_udp_encap.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/double_udp_encap.sh
> new file mode 100755
> index 000000000000..055f65b4d18d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/double_udp_encap.sh
> +# tcp retransmisions will break the accounting
> +[ "$KSFT_MACHINE_SLOW" = yes ] && FAIL_TO_XFAIL=yes
You should just be able to call `xfail_on_slow' without an argument to
apply the setting globally.
Selftests shouldn't have to touch FAIL_TO_XFAIL directly.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists