[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iL8FnPG9bD6zW0eHmeSNzc33SJgrUR7Aab4PFG-O4nfTw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 12:06:56 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: 戸田晃太 <kota.toda@...-cybersecurity.com>
Cc: pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
小池悠生 <yuki.koike@...-cybersecurity.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bonding: Fix header_ops type confusion
On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 11:33 AM 戸田晃太 <kota.toda@...-cybersecurity.com> wrote:
>
> Hello, Eric and other maintainers,
>
> I hope you’re doing well. I’m following up on our email, sent during
> the holiday season, in case it got buried.
>
> When you have a moment, could you please let us know if you had a
> chance to review it?
>
> Thank you in advance, and I look forward to your response.
>
I think it would be nice to provide an actual stack trace of the bug,
on a recent kernel tree.
We had recent patches dealing with dev->hard_header_len changes.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists