netdev - Re: [net-next, v3] wireguard: allowedips: Use kfree_rcu() instead of call

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20260115062641.57ef05fe@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 06:26:41 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Petr Vaněk <arkamar@...as.cz>
Cc: fushuai.wang@...ux.dev, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 davem@...emloft.net, vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev, Jason@...c4.com,
 wireguard@...ts.zx2c4.com, wangfushuai@...du.com
Subject: Re: [net-next, v3] wireguard: allowedips: Use kfree_rcu() instead
 of call_rcu()

On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 09:12:13 +0100 Petr Vaněk wrote:
> Hi Jakub,
> 
> Minor side note: I noticed a small typo in the AI review foreword. I
> assume this is part of a template:
> 
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 07:32:37PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
> > email has considered the AI review valid, or at least pausible.  
>                                                         ^~~~~~~~
> pausible -> plausible

Ah, thanks :)