[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260118003609.1042309-1-kuba@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2026 16:36:09 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: mmietus97@...oo.com
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
sd@...asysnail.net,
Jason@...c4.com
Subject: Re: [net-next,v5,03/11] net: tunnel: convert udp_tunnel{6,}_xmit_skb to noref
This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
For local reproduction steps see https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/ai-local.html
---
net: tunnel: convert udp_tunnel{6,}_xmit_skb to noref
This commit changes udp_tunnel{6,}_xmit_skb to use noref dst handling,
removing the requirement that callers take a reference on the dst.
The key change is replacing skb_dst_set() with skb_dst_set_noref() in
udp_tunnel6_xmit_skb().
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_udp_tunnel.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_udp_tunnel.c
> index cef3e0210744..d58815db8182 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/ip6_udp_tunnel.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_udp_tunnel.c
> @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ void udp_tunnel6_xmit_skb(struct dst_entry *dst, struct sock *sk,
>
> uh->len = htons(skb->len);
>
> - skb_dst_set(skb, dst);
> + skb_dst_set_noref(skb, dst);
skb_dst_set_noref() contains a WARN_ON check:
WARN_ON(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
Does this create an issue for the SCTP UDP encapsulation path?
Looking at sctp_v6_xmit() in net/sctp/ipv6.c, when SCTP sends via UDP
encapsulation, it calls:
udp_tunnel6_xmit_skb(dst, sk, skb, NULL, &fl6->saddr, &fl6->daddr,
tclass, ip6_dst_hoplimit(dst), label,
sctp_sk(sk)->udp_port, t->encap_port, false, 0);
This call path can originate from user context via sendmsg():
sctp_sendmsg()
-> sctp_primitive_SEND() [uses GFP_KERNEL - process context]
-> sctp_do_sm()
-> sctp_packet_transmit()
-> sctp_v6_xmit()
Unlike the network device transmit path (which runs under rcu_read_lock_bh()
from __dev_queue_xmit()), SCTP's control plane transmit path runs in process
context without RCU-BH protection.
Will this trigger the WARN_ON in skb_dst_set_noref() when SCTP sends UDP
encapsulated packets from process context?
>
> udp6_set_csum(nocheck, skb, saddr, daddr, skb->len);
[ ... ]
--
pw-bot: cr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists