[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260119122203.5113b16f@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 12:22:03 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jay Vosburgh <jv@...sburgh.net>, Andrew Lunn
<andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon
Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>, Shuah Khan
<shuah@...nel.org>, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, Liang Li
<liali@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net-next 2/3] bonding: restructure ad_churn_machine
On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 06:49:20 +0000 Hangbin Liu wrote:
> The current ad_churn_machine implementation only transitions the
> actor/partner churn state to churned or none after the churn timer expires.
> However, IEEE 802.1AX-2014 specifies that a port should enter the none
> state immediately once the actor’s port state enters synchronization.
Paolo, how do you feel about his patch with 2+ weeks until final?
The first patch is definitely suitable for net. If this one is not
it should not have a Fixes tag. I'd lean towards getting them all
into -rc7 if we can.
BTW please make sure to CC Nik (based on the Fixes tag I think).
Always run get_maintainers on the patches.
--
pw-bot: cr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists