[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <88981dea-63b5-4e50-89ea-f4ad38314504@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 10:54:07 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>, Andrew Lunn
<andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>, sdf@...ichev.me,
petrm@...dia.com, razor@...ckwall.org, idosch@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 01/10] net: introduce mangleid_features
On 1/20/26 9:58 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2026 at 4:10 PM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> wrote:
>> @@ -11385,6 +11385,12 @@ int register_netdevice(struct net_device *dev)
>> if (dev->hw_enc_features & NETIF_F_TSO)
>> dev->hw_enc_features |= NETIF_F_TSO_MANGLEID;
>>
>> + /* Any mangleid feature disables TSO_MANGLEID; including the latter
>> + * in mangleid_features allows for better code in the fastpath.
>> + */
>> + if (dev->mangleid_features)
>> + dev->mangleid_features |= NETIF_F_TSO_MANGLEID;
>> +
>
> It is a bit unclear why you test for anything being set in mangleid_features
>
> I would force here the bit, without any condition ?
>
> dev->mangleid_features |= NETIF_F_TSO_MANGLEID;
Indeed the check it's not needed. I'll drop it in the next revision, thanks!
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists