lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iL-w7ES=OsNQhLTZjxVdfOJxU2s7wRXJF6HkKSAZM2FBg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 16:41:23 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, 
	Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/3] gro: inline tcp6_gro_{receive,complete}

On Tue, Jan 20, 2026 at 4:30 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 18 Jan 2026 17:52:12 +0000 Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On some platforms, GRO stack is too deep and causes cpu stalls.
> >
> > Decreasing call depths by one shows a 1.5 % gain on Zen2 cpus.
> > (32 RX queues, 100Gbit NIC, RFS enabled, tcp_rr with 128 threads and 10,000 flows)
> >
> > We can go further by inlining ipv6_gro_{receive,complete}
> > and take care of IPv4 if there is interest.
> >
> > Note: two temporary __always_inline will be replaced with
> >       inline_for_performance when available.
> >
> > v2: dealt with udp6_gro_receive()/udp6_gro_complete()
> >     missing declarations (kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>)
> >     for CONFIG_MITIGATION_RETPOLINE=n
>
> Still not good?
>
> net/ipv6/udp_offload.c:136:17: error: static declaration of ‘udp6_gro_receive’ follows non-static declaration
>   136 | struct sk_buff *udp6_gro_receive(struct list_head *head, struct sk_buff *skb)
>       |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from net/ipv6/udp_offload.c:16:
> ./include/net/gro.h:408:17: note: previous declaration of ‘udp6_gro_receive’ with type ‘struct sk_buff *(struct list_head *, struct sk_buff *)’
>   408 | struct sk_buff *udp6_gro_receive(struct list_head *, struct sk_buff *);
>       |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> net/ipv6/udp_offload.c:168:29: error: static declaration of ‘udp6_gro_complete’ follows non-static declaration
>   168 | INDIRECT_CALLABLE_SCOPE int udp6_gro_complete(struct sk_buff *skb, int nhoff)
>       |                             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ./include/net/gro.h:409:5: note: previous declaration of ‘udp6_gro_complete’ with type ‘int(struct sk_buff *, int)’
>   409 | int udp6_gro_complete(struct sk_buff *, int);
>       |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Oh well, I thought I tested this stuff.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ