netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/3] gro: inline tcp6_gro

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20260120082942.3c62738b@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 08:29:42 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Paolo Abeni
 <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/3] gro: inline tcp6_gro_{receive,complete}

On Tue, 20 Jan 2026 16:44:52 +0100 Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2026 at 4:41 PM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
> > > Still not good?
> > >
> > > net/ipv6/udp_offload.c:136:17: error: static declaration of ‘udp6_gro_receive’ follows non-static declaration
> > >   136 | struct sk_buff *udp6_gro_receive(struct list_head *head, struct sk_buff *skb)
> > >       |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > In file included from net/ipv6/udp_offload.c:16:
> > > ./include/net/gro.h:408:17: note: previous declaration of ‘udp6_gro_receive’ with type ‘struct sk_buff *(struct list_head *, struct sk_buff *)’
> > >   408 | struct sk_buff *udp6_gro_receive(struct list_head *, struct sk_buff *);
> > >       |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > net/ipv6/udp_offload.c:168:29: error: static declaration of ‘udp6_gro_complete’ follows non-static declaration
> > >   168 | INDIRECT_CALLABLE_SCOPE int udp6_gro_complete(struct sk_buff *skb, int nhoff)
> > >       |                             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > ./include/net/gro.h:409:5: note: previous declaration of ‘udp6_gro_complete’ with type ‘int(struct sk_buff *, int)’
> > >   409 | int udp6_gro_complete(struct sk_buff *, int);
> > >       |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~  
> >
> > Oh well, I thought I tested this stuff.  
> 
> Interesting... clang (our default compiler for kernel) does not complain at all.

Well, at least I _think_ it's this series, haven't tested.
It breaks in the kselftests, no allmodconfig, here's the full config:

https://netdev-ctrl.bots.linux.dev/logs/vmksft/packetdrill-dbg/results/482021/config

Also possible that it's a silent conflict with another pending series.