[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d4563561-c507-4876-8a03-40e4dca2a34e@linux.dev>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 15:48:06 -0800
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
To: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Amery Hung <ameryhung@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...udflare.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 4/4] selftests/bpf: Remove tests for
prologue/epilogue with kfuncs
On 1/19/26 11:53 AM, Jakub Sitnicki wrote:
> Remove pro_epilogue_with_kfunc test program and its supporting code in
> bpf_testmod. This test exercised calling kfuncs from prologue and epilogue,
> which is no longer supported after the switch to direct helper calls.
Is it easy to change it to test calling helper in pro/epilogue?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists