[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id:
<176897100760.729216.7176451901339575079.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 04:50:07 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@...il.com>
Cc: ast@...nel.org, eddyz87@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net,
dsahern@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
martin.lau@...ux.dev, song@...nel.org, yonghong.song@...ux.dev,
john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...ichev.me,
haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 0/2] bpf,
x86: inline bpf_get_current_task() for x86_64
Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>:
On Tue, 20 Jan 2026 15:05:53 +0800 you wrote:
> Inline bpf_get_current_task() and bpf_get_current_task_btf() for x86_64
> to obtain better performance, and add the testcase for it.
>
> Changes since v5:
> * remove unnecessary 'ifdef' and __description in the selftests
> * v5: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260119070246.249499-1-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn/
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next,v6,1/2] bpf, x86: inline bpf_get_current_task() for x86_64
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/eaedea154eb9
- [bpf-next,v6,2/2] selftests/bpf: test the jited inline of bpf_get_current_task
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/4fca95095cdc
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists