[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f676c151-e871-4b2e-83f6-6d62bc146337@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 09:18:02 +0100
From: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: conor+dt@...nel.org, poros@...hat.com, anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, tariqt@...dia.com, robh@...nel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
aleksander.lobakin@...el.com, mbloch@...dia.com, jiri@...nulli.us,
Prathosh.Satish@...rochip.com, krzk+dt@...nel.org, saeedm@...dia.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com,
przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com, arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com,
jonathan.lemon@...il.com, saravanak@...nel.org,
aleksandr.loktionov@...el.com, mschmidt@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
leon@...nel.org, vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev, grzegorz.nitka@...el.com,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, richardcochran@...il.com,
andrew+netdev@...n.ch
Subject: Re: [net-next,v2,08/12] dpll: Enhance and consolidate reference
counting logic
On 1/21/26 1:16 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> This is an AI-generated review of your patch.
>
> Dunno if there's a reason for having this fixed by a later patch,
> if not let's fix. I'm sending the review mostly because of the
> comments on patch 12.
Will reorder these patches... Maybe it would be better to send patch 9
separately to net as this is the fix for the bug we found during
development of this series.
Ivan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists