[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bac96afe1a99c6a12cd85285c677f4eedcada066.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 17:32:49 -0800
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>
To: Menglong Dong <menglong.dong@...ux.dev>, Menglong Dong
<menglong8.dong@...il.com>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc: ast@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, dsahern@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org, martin.lau@...ux.dev,
song@...nel.org, yonghong.song@...ux.dev, john.fastabend@...il.com,
kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...ichev.me, haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 2/2] selftests/bpf: test the jited inline of
bpf_get_current_task
On Wed, 2026-01-21 at 09:28 +0800, Menglong Dong wrote:
[...]
> Do you mean that the CI of arm64 doesn't use LLVM for the selftests?
> I noted that. I found that there are other similar "__jited" testings for
> arm64, is there anything we can do?
>
> PS: I tested the arm64 locally, and it works fine.
>
> >
> > So we should do something about silently skipped tests at least...
>
> Like a warning?
Yes, probably llvm-devel or libs dependency is missing,
hence jit related selftests are skipped. Same thing for x86.
Discussed with Andrii making llvm an opt-out dependency:
fail selftests compilation if libraries are not found and SKIP_LLVM is not set.
We plan to address CI config issue tomorrow.
[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists