[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260121174505.5e710b0b@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 17:45:05 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Andre Carvalho <asantostc@...il.com>
Cc: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Shuah Khan
<shuah@...nel.org>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v11 7/7] selftests: netconsole: validate target
resume
On Wed, 21 Jan 2026 22:04:23 +0000 Andre Carvalho wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2026 at 05:20:57PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Sun, 18 Jan 2026 11:00:27 +0000 Andre Carvalho wrote:
> > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/netcons_resume.sh
> >
> > There's too many of them now and they keep failing on real HW.
>
> Since these tests are only using netdevsim I was a bit surprised about the failures
> on real HW runs.
My main point is that even if we fix the HW setups to do the right thing
in systemd policies - the tests are running against netdevsim, not the
precious HW present on those setups. The HW setups have actual physical
NICs, driver tests are expected to use netdevsim if $NETIF is not set,
and if set whatever existing netdev $NETIF is pointing to.
I don't remember the history, it's quite possible that Breno wanted to
have a separate target for netcons from the start and I pushed back.
I think we reached the point where we want to create a target.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists