[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260122072858.2b652eb7@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 07:28:58 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, syzkaller@...glegroups.com, andy@...yhouse.net,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, pabeni@...hat.com, j.vosburgh@...il.com,
davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [net] bonding: annotate data-races around slave->last_rx
On Thu, 22 Jan 2026 05:42:55 +0100 Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > This seems like the same concurrent access pattern that the ARP IPv4 path
> > needed fixing for.
>
> I saw this spot, but determined this was used at setup time, not in
> packet processing.
>
> I was maybe wrong.
I guess if nothing else we should do it for consistency?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists