netdev - Re: [net] bonding: annotate data-races around slave->last

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANn89i+7H32ODq3=nEfoORTR+6FiO2mOWRcLFf-K=+4UQcOmig@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 16:56:33 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, syzkaller@...glegroups.com, andy@...yhouse.net, 
	eric.dumazet@...il.com, pabeni@...hat.com, j.vosburgh@...il.com, 
	davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [net] bonding: annotate data-races around slave->last_rx

On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 4:50 PM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 4:29 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 22 Jan 2026 05:42:55 +0100 Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > > This seems like the same concurrent access pattern that the ARP IPv4 path
> > > > needed fixing for.
> > >
> > > I saw this spot, but determined this was used at setup time, not in
> > > packet processing.
> > >
> > > I was maybe wrong.
> >
> > I guess if nothing else we should do it for consistency?
>
> To be clear, I will cook a V2 with this part.
>

_bond_options_ns_ip6_target_set() probably needs a fix as well.

Is AI review stopping at the first error ?